Lawmakers in Missouri and Kansas are facing a decision regarding the future of the border truce that was signed in 2019. The truce aimed to stop the poaching of businesses across state lines in the Kansas City metro area. However, with the truce set to expire in August, there is a debate among legislators about whether to extend or remove the sunset clause.
The economic prosperity of Kansas City is crucial for both states, with about one-fourth of Missouri’s GDP coming from the city. Both Democrats and Republicans in Missouri agree that a renewal or removal of the sunset clause is necessary to prevent corporations from being pitted against each other.
Last year, Kansas amended its STAR bonds to attract sports teams like the Chiefs or Royals across the state line after Jackson County voters rejected a tax increase for new stadiums. While this move upset Missouri lawmakers, it may not necessarily violate the Border Truce agreement.
Missouri leaders have hinted at a possible response to Kansas’ actions, but no public action has been taken yet. Two bills have been introduced in the Missouri Capitol to extend the border truce indefinitely, but they are contingent on Kansas passing similar legislation. Both bills have not yet been heard in committee.
The decision on the border truce is crucial as it could impact the future of sports stadiums in Kansas City and the economic growth of the region. Any violation of the truce agreement could lead to further tensions between the two states.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
