President Trump’s proposal to remove up to 20 million people in a “whole of government” effort has been central to his housing pitch, claiming that mass deportations would free up homes for U.S. citizens and lower prices. However, economists doubt this claim, and analysts believe the logistical costs would be astronomical. Homebuilders also express skepticism, with concerns that such mass deportations would lead to a significant loss of construction workers.
Despite doubts from the industry, Trump has emphasized his deportation pitch, using racist rhetoric and claiming that mass deportations would make communities safer and save taxpayers money. The National Association of Home Builders has expressed concerns about the proposal and is advocating for immigration policy reform. Foreign-born construction workers have been shown to help sustain the housing market and keep building costs low, and a mass deportation effort could have significant negative effects on the industry.
Past examples in states like Florida and Arizona, where strict immigration policies led to an exodus of undocumented workers, have shown the potential destabilization such actions can cause. While some workers may return once they realize the policies are not being rigorously enforced, others may never come back. The industry is divided on the issue, with some executives supporting Trump for his ability to “get things done” while others, like Marek, a lifelong Republican, are not voting for Trump. Ultimately, there is a call for a serious conversation about immigration policy and reform to address the complexities and challenges facing the construction industry.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com