Former President Donald Trump has made false claims about the Department of Justice being restricted in its ability to take action against candidates close to an election, as he faces two federal indictments. Trump mentioned a supposed “60-day rule” that prevents the DOJ from interfering in elections within 60 days of the vote, but legal experts have debunked this claim. This vague guideline, not a legal requirement, has been followed by Justice Department officials to avoid influencing elections with overt law enforcement activities.
The controversy arose as Trump responded to an updated indictment in a federal election case in Washington, DC, and faced questions about another indictment in Florida. While Trump and some supporters criticized federal prosecutors for allegedly violating the guideline, experts argue that it does not apply to ongoing federal proceedings involving Trump.
Furthermore, the guideline only pertains to significant actions close to an election, not ongoing legal processes. Trump’s federal indictments fall outside the 60-day window, so the guideline theoretically would not impact those cases. State-level proceedings in New York and Georgia would also not be affected, as the guideline only applies at the federal level.
As Trump prepares for upcoming legal proceedings, he may have to reconsider his claims about the “60-day rule” and whether it applies to his situation. With the November 5 vote approaching, the legal battles surrounding Trump continue, showing the complex intersection of law and politics in the United States.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com