In a recent ruling, a federal court has struck down a Missouri investment rule that was seen as targeting companies engaging in “woke politics”. The rule required state pension funds to divest from companies that were deemed to be engaging in “politically motivated activity”.
The court found that the rule violated the First Amendment rights of the companies involved, as it amounted to government censorship of political speech. The ruling is a victory for free speech advocates and a blow to those who sought to use the power of the state to punish companies for their political beliefs.
The dispute arose when the Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS) adopted the rule in response to companies taking stands on social and political issues, such as climate change and racial justice. The rule targeted companies engaged in what some deemed as “woke politics”, or advocacy for progressive social causes.
However, the court found that the rule was too broad and vague, and could potentially infringe on the free speech rights of companies that engage in political advocacy. The ruling is a reminder of the importance of protecting free speech rights, even when it comes to controversial or divisive issues.
The decision is likely to have broader implications for other states that have similar rules targeting companies for their political beliefs. It serves as a reminder that the government must tread carefully when it comes to regulating political speech, and that the First Amendment rights of individuals and companies must be protected.
Overall, the ruling is a win for free speech advocates and a reminder of the importance of upholding constitutional rights, even in the face of political pressure.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com