In a recent development, Acting U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft has rejected a ban on Delta-8 THC in Missouri. This decision has raised questions about whether it was motivated by retribution against the state’s governor.
Delta-8 THC is a psychoactive cannabinoid derived from hemp, and its legality has been a topic of debate across the country. In Missouri, on October 20, the state banned the sale and possession of Delta-8 THC, citing concerns about its psychoactive effects. However, Ashcroft’s rejection of the ban has now overturned this decision.
The timing of this move has led to speculation that it may be a form of retribution against Missouri Governor Mike Parson. Parson had publicly criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the investigation into the death of George Floyd, which may have led to tensions between the state and federal government.
Ashcroft’s decision to reject the ban on Delta-8 THC was met with mixed reactions. Supporters of the ban believe that Delta-8 THC poses risks to public health and safety, while opponents argue that it should be regulated rather than banned outright.
The implications of this decision are significant, as it sets a precedent for how the federal government will handle the regulation of psychoactive substances derived from hemp. It also highlights the ongoing tensions between states and the federal government on issues related to drug policy.
Overall, Ashcroft’s rejection of the ban on Delta-8 THC in Missouri raises important questions about the balance of power between the state and federal government, as well as the challenges of regulating substances with potential psychoactive effects.
Source
Photo credit www.kansascity.com