For years, the controversial policing tactic of “stop and frisk” has been a subject of legal battles due to its disproportionately negative impact on Black and brown men. In 2013, a federal judge deemed the practice unconstitutional, effectively banning it. However, former President Donald Trump has expressed interest in reinstating stop and frisk as part of his anti-crime platform, with the threat of withholding critical federal funds from police departments that do not comply.
Many Black men have shared their traumatic experiences with stop and frisk, highlighting the racial profiling and humiliation they endured. Despite Trump’s efforts to appeal to Black voters, his support for stop and frisk has sparked backlash from those who view it as discriminatory and harmful to marginalized communities. While some argue that the tactic may be effective in high-crime areas, others emphasize the need for better police training and implementation to prevent targeting innocent individuals.
Critics have raised concerns about the psychological effects of stop and frisk, as well as its disproportionate impact on people of color. Various studies have shown that the practice was overwhelmingly used against Black individuals, with a high percentage of innocent people being stopped. Ultimately, the unconstitutional nature of stop and frisk was confirmed by a federal judge, who criticized the policy for its racial discrimination and violation of constitutional rights.
Despite Trump’s push for a national stop and frisk policy, the execution remains unclear due to the jurisdiction of policing falling under state and local laws. Experts warn of the negative consequences of such a policy, emphasizing the potential for increased distrust between communities of color and law enforcement. In contrast, Joe Biden’s campaign has supported measures to address police misconduct and improve accountability, offering an alternative to the contentious debate surrounding stop and frisk.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com