The Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump has immunity for some conduct during his time in office related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in a federal election interference case. The justices voted 6-3 to reject Trump’s broad claim of immunity, but decided that some actions closely related to his core duties as president are off-limits to prosecutors. The ruling presents a challenge for special counsel Jack Smith in taking the case to trial. Following the ruling, Trump expressed pride in being an American and considered it a win for the Constitution and democracy. However, Democrats condemned the decision, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer stating that it could weaken democracy.
The court’s decision means that further proceedings will be needed in lower courts to determine what conduct Trump can be prosecuted for. The ruling protects Trump from being prosecuted for some official acts, such as his contacts with Justice Department officials, but not for other actions, such as pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to reject election results leading up to the January 6th Capitol attack. The dissenting liberal justices critiqued the decision, expressing concerns about its implications for democratic self-governance.
The case is unprecedented as no president has been prosecuted after leaving office. Trump faces charges related to conspiracy, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against voting rights in connection to the 2020 election. The trial may not conclude before Election Day due to procedural delays. The Supreme Court’s decision is seen as a setback for Smith, as it limits the admissibility of evidence related to Trump’s immunity in trial.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com